exciting, informative, snarky, and very likely fabricated tales of life as an american expat in london

hot under the collar

by Jen at 5:31 pm on 12.07.2009 | 3 Comments
filed under: rant and rage

this kind of thing makes me so angry: tories think they should impose a 3 month “cooling off” period before people can file for divorce.

it just demonstrates and reinforces the same idiotic stereotypes that so many conservatives have – as if people take an irresposible, cavalier attitude towards ending a marriage, or that it’s too easy for people to make life-changing decisions.  a distorted perception that bears absolutely not resemblance to the truth of most any divorced person i know.

my divorce was amicable, quickly resolved, and without a doubt, the right decision, arrived at after several years of counselling – and it was still the worst experience of my life.  the idea that some stuffed-shirt could or should tell me that i need an additional 3 months to “cool off” is beyond insulting.  i don’t know anyone who ever comes to a decision to divorce as a result of some sort of impetutous, overheated whim.  no one takes the decision to dissolve their life with their spouse lightly.  no one.  deciding to divorce is a painful and heavy moment.  so who are these people that need to “cool off” to make sure they’re doing what

divorce in the u.k. is already more difficult than in many places:

- you cannot divorce until you’ve been married for a full year
- there is no “no fault” divorce
- unless you accuse your spouse of adultery or unreasonable behaviour, you have to be separated for 2 years first
- even if your spouse has left you, you have to wait two years to be divorced

the idea that adding another 3 months to an already emotionally wrought and drawn-out process will somehow dissuade people from frivolously divorcing is, frankly, insulting.  and what about people who’ve been psychologically or physically abused? should they be forced to stay married for an additional 3 months to salve the conscience of a group of politicians?

the clue to the kind of thinking that prompted the report can be found at the end of the article:

Mr Duncan Smith told the BBC that compared to their grandparents, young people had “very high” expectations of marriage “far beyond actually what it will deliver”.

He added: “It’s ironic really, given the nature of family breakdown around them, they have this incredibly high expectation of it.

“And so the idea of compromise from day one, two living as cheaply as one, seems to have disappeared.

“You do not need a £20,000 themed wedding to be a happily-married couple.”

ah, that’s it – today’s young generation of selfish, spendthrift couples who need a lesson from their elders. oh, well that’s okay then!

3 Comments »

3 Comments

  • 1

    Comment by blues

    12.07.2009 @ 22:12 pm

    It’s precisely because we come from broken homes that we have high expectations of it. We learn that our divorced parents just weren’t right for each other and that you just have to find the right one. So when we go to get married, convinced that we have found the right one, we are in for a rude awakening when we discover that it ain’t that simple.

    I don’t understand what the point of adding three more months to the process is, as if it would make absolutely any difference to anyone. They think we’re a bunch of stupid sheep.

  • 2

    Comment by A Free Man

    13.07.2009 @ 00:59 am

    There doesn’t seem to be a great alternative to Labour in the UK. They’re kind of the lesser of two and a half evils. Quite like the Dems in the States.

  • 3

    Comment by lisa

    14.07.2009 @ 04:43 am

    It is almost as bad as some States requiring them to go to counseling or mediation before filing for divorce. dizzy

RSS feed for comments on this post